On this page, I am providing four different methods to show the following integral result.
This integral is particularly interesting because despite its simple appearance, there are a variety of different methods available to evaluate it, though none of the methods are all that easy to work out initially.
Method 1: the conventional trick
Multiply first by the factor .
Now, notice that the numerator is the derivative of the denominator, so we can use the pattern
Method 2: substitution
Let , so which gives . Since , we can hence write , which can be put into the integral.
This is a well-known integral.
Switch to the logarithmic version of .
Back-substitute , taking advantage of the identity .
Method 3: substitution
Let , so and hence . Since , this can be rewritten as and put into the integral.
This is a well-known integral.
Switch to the logarithmic version of .
Back-substitute , taking advantage of the identity .
Method 4: via Weierstrass substitution
Use the double-angle identity to expand in terms of and .
Hence,
Let , so .
Perform a partial fraction decomposition and integrate.
Back-substitute .
This result is equivalent to . Click below to see a proof.
Proof of equivalence to